On 5/7/08, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11378 March 1977, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > I think it would be very nice to press these into some common form, such as
> > X-Debian: BTS
> > X-Debian: DAK
> > X-Debian: PTS
> > X-Debian: BTS-link
>
> > Maybe there is a quasi-standard for constructing these X- headers.
>
> While I think most of daks mails do have X-Katie or X-DAK headers I do
> like X-Debian: FOO and so will go and _add_ this to *all* dak mails
> now. Including the queue daemon. Should be merged later today.
Are these headers supposed to be mail headers, or pseudo-headers such
as the BTS accepts. I thought the former, but I just got this from
Dak:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Processing of torrentflux_2.3-9_amd64.changes
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 23:56:07 +0000
X-Debian: DAK
torrentflux_2.3-9_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
torrentflux_2.3-9.dsc
torrentflux_2.3-9.diff.gz
torrentflux_2.3-9_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Is that a bug, or were my assumptions wrong? FWIW, I think using real
(not pseudo) mail headers is a mildly better solution, but I'm happy
either way.
Thanks,
Cameron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
