Hi Julien,
Il giorno ven, 02/05/2008 alle 16.25 +0200, Julien BLACHE ha scritto:
[...]
> So neither saned nor the net backend are at fault here.
>
> Which backend is used by saned on the server side? I know we've seen
> some strange things with the epson backend in the past.
I have the same behavior with two scanners:
fujitsu fi-5110C (backend fujitsu)
epson perfection 1670 photo (backend snapscan)
As a test, on a machine with only the fujitsu connected,
i use /etc/sane.d/saned.conf with only one host line "localhost"
and /etc/sane.d/net.conf with the same line.
saned is started by inetd with this line:
sane-port stream tcp nowait saned.saned /usr/sbin/saned /usr/sbin/saned
with this configuration, I run scanimage and get this output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ scanimage -L
[sanei_wire] sanei_w_array: DECODE: maximum amount of allocated memory
exceeded (limit: 1048576, new allocation: 3145728, total: 4194304 bytes)
Segmentation fault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
this happens because the list of devices is not just one or two, but
something like 638027 (a very large number).
A few more information:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ which scanimage
/usr/bin/scanimage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /usr/bin/scanimage
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 37564 19 apr 17:45 /usr/bin/scanimage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy libsane
libsane:
Installato: 1.0.19-5
Candidato: 1.0.19-5
Tabella versione:
*** 1.0.19-5 0
500 http://ftp.it.debian.org testing/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1.0.18-5 0
500 http://ftp.it.debian.org etch/main Packages
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy sane-utils
sane-utils:
Installato: 1.0.19-5
Candidato: 1.0.19-5
Tabella versione:
*** 1.0.19-5 0
500 http://ftp.it.debian.org testing/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1.0.18-5 0
500 http://ftp.it.debian.org etch/main Packages
> JB.
>
Bye,
Giuseppe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
