On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:34:25PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:02:22PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 07:00:40PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 05:43:30PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >> >On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 05:21:18PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL 
> >> >PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> python-xpcom 1.9~b5-3 depends on python (< current.1) and python (>= 
> >> >> current), none of those ever fulfillable on a Debian system.
> >> 
> >> >Looks like a possible bug in dh_pysupport...
> >> 
> >> I suspect that too.  I went as far as recompiling the package a couple 
> >> of times with different stuff in debian/pyversions without luck (phew - 
> >> it is quite a heavy package to compile - thanksfully I used 
> >> compile-caching!).
> >> 
> >> An ugly workaround for now is replacing ${python:Depends} in 
> >> debian/control with the following:
> >> 
> >> python, python (<< 2.6), python (<< 2.5.2.1), python (>= 2.5.2), 
> >> python-support (>= 0.7.1)
> >> 
> >> With that hack, it finally works to build the Browse activity for Sugar 
> >> (the GUI developed for OLPC - One Laptop Per Child).  Yeah!
> >> 
> >
> >Okay, seems like this has to do with the python modules not being in
> >/usr/lib/pythonX.Y/site-packages/...
> 
> Still feels like a bug in python (providing pyversions) to me:  It 
> should be supported to install private-only Python modules.
> 
> I suggest you use my proposed hack for now (so that I can get 
> sugar-hulahop and sugar-browse-activity past NEW queue and into 
> experimental) and reassign this bug to Python.

Do they depend on python-xpcom from experimental only? Note that I
hadn't tried the python xpcom glue before today, and it has several
problems compared to the older version: python program must be run from
the MOZILLA_HOME, and LD_LIBRARY_PATH set... Obviously that will need to
be fixed.

The packages in unstable should be fine, though.

Mike



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to