On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Justin Piszcz wrote: > On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Justin Piszcz wrote: > >> I submitted a bug report in 2006, the Debian team got around to closing >> the case and the header was from the day I submitted the bug, I would >> not have received the update had I blocked dates < today/2008, etc: >> >> Apr 26 01:48:51 p34 postfix/cleanup[30209]: 57FBA1C00009F: warning: >> header Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 06:22:19 -0500 (EST) from >> rietz.debian.org[140.211.166.43]; from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> proto=ESMTP helo=<rietz.debian.org>: RULE=400 DATE >> BEFORE 2008 >> >> More often than not it seems spammers' systems are very good with the >> dates and legitimate systems fall prey to such a rule..
There are two issues here; the first is that this rule is broken, the second is that debbugs does not set a Date: header at all. The Date: header that this is triggering on is within a mime enclosed rfc822 mail, not the actual header of the mail being sent. Your rule should be fixed to resolve this. The second issue is already filed as #458757. Don Armstrong -- <Clint> why the hell does kernel-source-2.6.3 depend on xfree86-common? <infinity> It... Doesn't? <Clint> good point http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
