Luk Claes wrote:
> José Luis Tallón wrote:
>
>>> The attached file is the diff for my kchmviewer 3.1-1.1 NMU. The associated
>>> changelog entry is:
>>>
>>> kchmviewer (3.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
>>>
>>> * Non-maintainer upload.
>>> * Bump Standards-Version to 3.7.3.
>>> * Correct typographical error in package description (Gnome -> GNOME)
>>> * Fix FTBFS with GCC 4.3 (Closes: #474869)
>>> * Correct debian/watch file to report upstream version correctly
>>> (Closes: #449696)
>>>
>>>
>> Well, thanks, you just rendered my Maintainer Upload useless.
>> It has been ready, and sent to an sponsor, for over two weeks now.
>>
>
> It would have been better to mention this in the bug report instead of
> just tagging it pending...
>
>
>> I know we are already at 0-day NMU, but this was impolite at the very least.
>>
>
> I don't think that helping by doing an NMU is impolite, though this
> might just be a misunderstanding of your use of the pending tag...
>
Thanks, Luk.
I *do* appreciate NMUs (I have just thanked Christian Perrier for his),
but even when not required I creatinly prefer to be notified and be able
to answer.
Unfortunately, it usually takes me a lot to find new sponsors (and my
usual sponsors are all overloaded). Hence, I do not get that many
opportunities to do it "right". I have been yelling at -mentors for some
sponsored uploads for about two months, and almost nobody responded ---
I did get up-imapproxy uploaded, however.
Cheers,
J.L.
