On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:06:30PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> while reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that
> should maybe be removed from the archive, because:

In principle I would object with a NACK.

However, I'm not going to write the motivations write away as I'm
considering, together with the other upstream maintainers, to merge
gdome2-xslt into gmetadom. If that solution will not turn out to be
feasible I'll get back to you.

> * Release goal bug open and unanswered for 15 days. Yes, I know this is
>   not that long, but there was another RC bug that was fixed in an NMU
>   after 2.5 months of inactivity.

FWIW, that NMU was debated, and wrong; the official upload was being
delayed for noting in the feet of a large OCaml transition.

> * It has another bug marked pending for almost four months without any
>   upload coming.

IIRC that was pending waiting for the upload of a GCC 4.3 compatible
gmetadom version, which in turn was delayed for the mass of the
disparity of GCCs on different archs.

Thanks for your investigation.
Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
[EMAIL PROTECTED],cs.unibo.it,debian.org}  -<%>-  http://upsilon.cc/zack/
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?    /\    All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema    \/    right keys at the right time



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to