Package: libgtksourceview-dev Version: 1.2.0-1 Severity: minor APT announces:
libgtksourceview-dev/unstable uptodate 1.2.0-1 and according to http://packages.debian.org/unstable/libdevel/libgtksourceview-dev the upstream source of the this package is <http://gtksourceview.sourceforge.net/>. I'm confused, because at the upstream page <http://gtksourceview.sourceforge.net/downloads.html> it reads: Latest stable release of GtkSourceView is 0.8 and can be dowloaded from here ... Shouldn't the Debian packaging name reflect the upstream version numbering? Now it is 1.2.0 and that does not relate to the upstream. According to policy: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html 5.6.11 Version The version number of a package. The format is: [epoch:]upstream_version[-debian_revision] So, this bug report: "is there possibly inconsistent version scheme used in the package name"? -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US) Versions of packages libgtksourceview-dev depends on: ii libgnomeprintui2.2-dev 2.8.2-2 GNOME 2.2 print architecture User ii libgtk2.0-dev 2.6.4-3 Development files for the GTK+ lib ii libgtksourceview-doc 1.2.0-1 documentation for the GTK+ syntax ii libgtksourceview1.0-0 1.2.0-1 shared libraries for the GTK+ synt -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
