Martin-Éric Racine wrote: >> right. however, I'd like to use the same version scheme we use for >> linux-modules-extra-2.6 in future for firmware-nonfree too (whereas the >> 'kernel-version' from lme version would be translated to the >> firmware-nonfree source package version). That solves your concern about >> version numbers. Do you have any others? > > This provides a match against a kernel package version, which says > nothing of the upstream firmware version that the binary package > provides. As those firmware blobs don't tend to be specific to a > kernel build, this version scheme isn't very practical.
no. please read carefully. that is why i said that the 'kernel-version' from lme is replaced with the firmware-nonfree version. means.. the firmware-nonfree source package has e.g. version 0.11, firmware-foo has 0.11+1.2.3, firmware-bar has 0.11+4.5.6 etc. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
