Florian Lohoff wrote: > is "grave" really the right priority for this bug?
Yes, it is. http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities > grave > makes the package in question unusable or mostly so, or causes data > loss, or introduces a security hole allowing access to the accounts of > users who use the package. As you can see "causes data loss" so this is a grave bug. > I mean if you fill up your disk you get what you deserve. Many people do not want to loose all their preferences at full disk or system crash. I hope you are not serious and do not mind losing all your data because the disk went full or the system crashed. > I don't think somebody files > a grave bug against a package because the application dies when there is > no memory left. > > I think "normal" would fit better - and Mako please NMU ... > > This is a simple bug with a patch and the MIA Maintainer is not > really serving our users by letting gqview beeing removed from > testing. This package is de facto orphaned as the maintainer is MIA. Ahora también puedes acceder a tu correo Terra desde el móvil. Infórmate pinchando aquí.
