hi Anthony,
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 12:49:47AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> However, as it stands now: After the recent audioscrobbler downtime, I
> had hundreds of tracks in the scrobblerqueue file. Then, xmms-scrobbler
> managed to reconnect to audioscrobler (when it finally came back) and
> promptly through away the vast majority of my data.
indeed, i can reproduce this. From about 100 Submissions only ~10 found
its way into the audioscrobbler database.
> As xmms-scrobbler currently stands, it throws out the user's data
> arbitrarily, often hangs xmms, apparently can crash xmms [and, look at
> the crap on the stack in that backtrace --- PGAT --- plain old ASCII.
> Looks exploitable], etc. For all these reasons, I really doubt we should
> ship xmms-scrobbler as-is in Sarge.
a pity.
bye,
- michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
