On Mi, 2008-04-02 at 19:20 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 02/04/08 at 19:16 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > > severity 473951 important > > thanks > > > > On Mi, 2008-04-02 at 12:33 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > Package: gtk-doc > > > Version: 1.10-1 > > > Severity: serious > > > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080401 qa-ftbfs > > > Justification: FTBFS on i386 > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > > > i386. > > > > > > Likely to be caused by one of your build-deps depending on openjade. > > > > I can't reproduce this with an up to date sid. Could it be that your > > build environment was confused by the conditional "openjade | jade > > | ..." dependencies of one of the build dependencies? An Ubuntu buildd > > had the same problem some time ago... > > > > I'm lowering the severity to important now... > > Hi, > > Yes, sbuild doesn't support a | b build-dependencies (it always picks > a).
So that's a bug in sbuild then, right?
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
