1. As I pointed out in another report, /etc/vsftpd
might be a suitable place for the empty directory.
vsftpd also let the user use more configuration files
for various tasks. /etc/vsftpd should be a natural
place for those configuration files.
2. The transition can be made easier by keeping
/etc/vsftpd.conf for a while, and activating vsftpd
from within the init script with the new configuration
file as an argument. A better way might be to use the
maintainer scripts to move the configuration file into
the new directory. Getting rid of /usr/doc involved
thousands of packages. Here it is only one file for
one package.
3. If I didn't convince you and you don't like many
open bugs for the vsftpd package, then I don't mind if
you close the report instead of leaving it in an
wontfix state.
--- Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tag 472196 wontfix
> thanks
>
> shaul Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Many packages create a dedicated directory in
> /etc.
> > I find it better organized.
>
> I think it's unnecessary for a single file, and the
> transition would be
> quite a hassle (cf. how long it took us to get rid
> of /usr/doc).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matej
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
