On Tuesday 18 March 2008 07:43:47 pm Nico Golde wrote: > * Scott Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-18 20:40]: > > You closed the old bug just before I was to follow up on it. I've since > > restarted my system anyhow. I gave up on it until "next time" (which > > would be now). > > Ok so just to clarify, this is no behaviour you are able to > trigger on purpose?
That's right. > Ok. Please try the backport. On it :) > If it has the same problem I > highly doubt this is an openbox issue (sure I can still be > wrong :). If not you have to wait for lenny cause I have > really no idea what to do with this bug. I included back traces that with debugging symbols. If they've fixed this bug, as Mikael Magnusson indicated, it's a moot point. Otherwise you have the lines of source where it's munching cpu at. (upstream would know more?) Thanks. Scott Edwards -- Daxal Communications - http://daxal.com/?from=debian+bts -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
