> Not sure about adding a question about interface names; netcfg already > uses link information to decide which one of multiple interfaces to use > and I'm not convinced renamingthe interfaces warrants another question > (in high priority anyway).
In high priority, sure.... That may be discussed for a question at low priority, but it having static names for interfaces is feasible without prompting, that's already a great step. We also remains with Matt's suggestion about giving some way to '"recognize" interfaces and plug the sable in the right one with something more elaborated than trial and error. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
