Dear python-glpk and python-cvxopt maintainers,
I am bringing to your attention Bug#469732, filed against libglpk0 version
4.27-1. Since this version of glpk, MathPROG support in GLPK has been
activated. This results in pulling a series of dependent packages related
to iodbc and mysql. I am contacting you because your packages depend on
libglpk0.
I am thinking about generating two separate library packages from the glpk
source and I am wondering which would be the best naming scheme. These are
the options I am considering:
with MathPROG without MathPROG
1st option libglpk0 libglpk-light0
2nd option libglpk-mathprog0 libglpk0
Which would be more appropriate?
--
Rafael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
