On Friday 29 February 2008, CJ van den Berg wrote: > can you explain why you consider this a pulseaudio bug? I don't know too > much about SELinux I'm afaid, but this looks like a problem with the > SELinux policy. I don't see how pulseaudio is supposed to avoid/solve > this problem.
Yes, now the ownership issue has been addressed. It should be re-assigned to the selinux policy package. There was no clear indication to wether each individual package should provide a policy or not. Now that has been made clear. Can you please re-assign it to the selinux package ? Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
