On dim, 2008-02-17 at 11:15 +0100, Simon Pepping wrote: > On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 08:21:15PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > I guess we can display a big warning if gtk-update-icon-cache fails, and > > exit without error to allow the upgrade to proceed nevertheless. > > > > Would that be OK for you? > > Would it not be better to keep the error exit code but make sure that > it is not the exit code of the postrm script? A straightforward way to > do that would be to add the true command after the update-icon-caches > command. This shows that a failure of the update-icon-caches command > is not fatal for the upgrade process.
As the update-icon-caches command is not really meant to be used outside the debhelper scripts, I guess the effect would be the same. Changing debhelper means rebuilding all packages using it. Changing the script means it works right now for everyone. Pick your choice :) -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
