> I was not planning on pushing this into sid. While I think that Javier
> is correct, I don't see it as necessary for sarge; it can easily be
> corrected on a local basis. OTOH, if the release team says "yes,
> please do it", I wouldn't object: it *is* about safe as a change can
> be.

this makes all Sarge systems go down with a simple fork-bomb. This is
quite a serious security issue. I would even think this issue is big
enough to send a security update *after* the sarge release.

Did you read the slashdot story about system being affected by
fork-bombs? Debian Woody was not. Several other distributions were
affected, and quickly changed their policy. If Sarge will be affected by
a simple fork-bomb that is a serious regression.

regards,
        Olivier



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to