Hi, On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 22:13 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: [...] > after the "fix" for bug #461653 I get tons of errors in my scripts for > redirecting messages to stderr: > > ,---- > | possible bashism in baz line 13 (should be >word 2>&1): > | echo "foobar" >&2 > `---- > > According to > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html, > sections 2.7.5 and 2.7.6, the constructions <&word and >&word are > perfectly valid /bin/sh syntax. Please don't complain about them.
Indeed (although the bash manpage doesn't exactly help the impression of >& being bash-specific). So far as I can see, however, &> /is/ a bashism, so I'll amend the test to just check for that. Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
