Indeed we can, thanks for taking care of the removal request for me. cheers k
On Jan 30, 2008 9:21 AM, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > reassign 462388 ftp.debian.org > severity 462388 normal > retitle 462388 RM: mozart-gtk -- RoM, RoRA; obsolete, dead upstream > block 460780 with 462388 > tag 460780 - moreinfo > thanks > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 04:16:15PM +0000, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 04:04:59PM +0000, Kevin Glynn wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > Package: mozart-gtk > > > > Severity: important > > > > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Usertags: gnome-1.x-removal > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Your package (mozart-gtk) has been detected as depending on > > > > gnome-libs, which as per release goal, won't be shipped in lenny. > > > > > > > > Please make sure that your package drops its dependencies on > > > > gnome-libs as soon as possible, or that it's ported to gnome2 one way > > > > or the other. > > > > > > > > This bug will be raised to RC severity as soon as gnome-libs are > > > > removed from testing, which should happen soon, since it will make > > > > your package uninstallable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I intend to request removal after 7 days, pending the outcome of a > > > discussion I have started on the mozart mailing list, see: > > > > > > > > > http://lists.gforge.info.ucl.ac.be/pipermail/mozart-hackers/2008/002910.html > > > > Wonderful. BTW, don't worry about my last mail that raised the bug to > > serious, I totally missed that package that wasn't built on amd64 (the > > architecture I looked at gnome 1.x packages onto), hence the recent bug. > > I won't blame you if you need some more time. The other gnome 1.x bugs I > > filed were already 10 days old. > > Given [0] and f-ups, I assume we can get rid of it then. > > [0] > http://lists.gforge.info.ucl.ac.be/pipermail/mozart-hackers/2008/002911.html > > -- > ·O· Pierre Habouzit > ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] > OOO http://www.madism.org >
