Hello, and thank you for the help!
> I don't mean any offense, but looking at the ITP and the libdc1394v2
> package itself, I get the feeling that you are not completely up to date
> with Debian packaging:

No offense. I tried to be, but the documentation is not exactly the best 
readable lecture for this thing...

> - There is no bug severity named "urgent", and ITPs should have severity
>   "wishlist".

I was trying to pull a string there, sorry if it was inappropriate...

> - The way to ensure library packages don't conflict with older versions
>   is to append the soname to the package names, it should be
>   libdc1394-22 instead of libdc1394v2.

Done already...

> - Missing and incorrect Conflicts: entries in the control file for Debian.

If you mean the Conflicts with 11 and 13, we don't want those two packages to 
conflict. The SO 22 can work with 13 or 11 without problems...

> Therefore I decided to use Peter de Schrijver's and my own packaging as
> a basis for packaging 2.0.1. I'm adopting the packages from Peter de
> Schrijver. I will include a -doc package and rename -examples to -utils.
> If you have other suggestions I will be happy to hear them.

You mean by -doc, the doc package that we generate using doxygen?

> If you really want to maintain the Debian packages yourself, read all on
> http://www.debian.org/devel/, read up on all Debian bug reports
> regarding libdc1394, and try to become an official Debian developer.
> Otherwise, I think it is better that you work on the library itself
> instead of its packaging; I believe there is a lot to do to get
> everything working with the juju stack.

No. I didn't want to do this job, it was just that Peter didn't answer the 
call and we were wondering what to do to speed up things. As I was playing 
already with Launchpad PPA, I decided to do the packaging there until we get 
somebody from Debian. Once the package was mature enough (we were three guys 
working on the new package) we decided to give it a try with the WNPP ITP...

As I am part of the development process, I also thought that it will be nice 
if we close the loop a bit and provide you, the maintainers from Debian, with 
our idea of packages. Hope that it was helpful...

Let me know the continuatio...

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
 Peter Antoniac, PhD
 https://launchpad.net/~theseinfeld
 GIT/CS a C+++ UL+++$ w--- PGP++ e++++



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to