Em Dom, 2005-01-23 Ãs 18:55 -0800, Ryan Lovett escreveu: > http://www.burtonini.com/computing/gnome-policy-20050123.html#id2448510 > > "Programs that the end user can actually run (such as File Roller) should > be packaged as the name of the program. Do not suffix the package with a 2 > to represent the GNOME 2 package; if upstream is maintaining both GNOME 1 > and GNOME 2 releases, then name the GNOME 1 package foo-gnome1 instead.
Hey, The consensus on debian-gtk-gnome some time ago was that this would be worked on after sarge is released. Just FYI, I'll follow that consensus. Sorry for the delay on posting a reply =(. Thanks! -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gustavo Noronha <http://couve.no-ip.org/~kov/> Debian: <http://www.debian.org/> * <http://www.debian-br.org/>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
