Roland, This is not a debian bug. It could be argued that introducing those changes in just the debian package would be a bug, since we would now have library headers that are different from the upstream (for no particularly strong reason), which might lead to binary incompatabilities in built code, etc.
Debian bug tracking can't really be a clearing house for all wishlist changes to upstream sources - so I'd really like to just refer this upstream and when they fix it in a later version, the new debian packages will include it. cheers, Chris On 5/5/05, Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > reopen 272308 > thanks > > Hi, > > please don't close bugs without them being fixed. > > You wrote: > > This issues doesn't affect the actual debian package (it affects the > > libxml++ source) > > But it actually does! That's why I reported the bug in the first place. > Many of the files in question appear in the -dev package, so relevant to > the user. > > > so I'm going to defer this to be fixed upstream in a later release. > > Please keep such bugs open until the fix propagates (directly or via > upstream) to the Debian version of the package. > > Thanks. > > bye, > Roland > -- > >
