On Thu Jan 03, 2008 at 19:07:00 +0100, Uwe Hermann wrote: > Not sure. I still find it pretty useful as it's a small command line > tool and can check sourcecode without having to actually compile it
Agreed. > (or install a huge compiler - pscan is 18 KB big). Also, it does static > checking, so it works pretty much in all cases, whereas the gcc solution > probably requires that you are actually able to build the package you > want to check (and have lots of dependencies and build tools installed etc). Agreed. I'd keep it unless there is a significant reason not to - grave bugs that can't be fixed, etc - I don't regard the gcc test as a good enough reason to remove it alone. Steve -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
