Package: libpam-shield
Version: 0.9.2-2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
The description field reads
It locks out default by null-route or iptable rule attackers
trying to login by brue-force methods.
As a native English speaker, I find this structure a bit difficult to
follow -- it sounds like the package locks out "iptable rule
attackers" using null-route. Why would anyone attack an iptable rule?
Instead I propose
It locks out brute-force password crackers using null-route or
iptables rules.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
