Package: reportbug
Version: 3.39
Severity: normal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I accidentally omitted a wnpp report's suggested short description;
reportbug then started treating the report as a regular bug report,
which was slightly confusing:
$ reportbug wnpp
*** Welcome to reportbug. Use ? for help at prompts. ***
Detected character set: UTF-8
Please change your locale if this is incorrect.
Using 'Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' as your from address.
Getting status for wnpp...
Will send report to Debian (per lsb_release).
What sort of request is this? (If none of these things mean anything to you, or
you are trying to report a bug in an existing package, please press Enter to
exit reportbug.)
1 ITP This is an `Intent To Package'. Please submit a package description
along with copyright and URL in such a report.
2 O The package has been `Orphaned'. It needs a new maintainer as soon as
possible.
3 RFA This is a `Request for Adoption'. Due to lack of time, resources,
interest or something similar, the current maintainer is asking for
someone else to maintain this package. He/she will maintain it in the
meantime, but perhaps not in the best possible way. In short: the
package needs a new maintainer.
4 RFH This is a `Request For Help'. The current maintainer wants to continue
to maintain this package, but he/she needs some help to do this, because
his/her time is limited or the package is quite big and needs several
maintainers.
5 RFP This is a `Request For Package'. You have found an interesting piece of
software and would like someone else to maintain it for Debian. Please
submit a package description along with copyright and URL in such a
report.
Choose the request type: 5
Please enter the proposed package name: python-selector
Checking status database...
Please briefly describe this package; this should be an appropriate short
description for the eventual package:
>
Querying Debian BTS for reports on wnpp (source)...
3071 bug reports found:
Outstanding bugs -- Serious (policy violations or makes package unfit for
release); Unclassified (8 bugs)
1) #156532: O: swedish -- The Swedish dictionary for ispell.
2) #180060: O: xgsmlib -- Gnome application to handle mobile phone's phone
3) #195969: O: libzvt -- The GNOME 2 zvt (zterm) widget
4) #264107: O: dia2code -- a dia-UML code generator
5) #268912: O: x10 -- Operate X-10 electrical power control modules.
6) #274281: O: volume.app -- A dockapp enabling easy control of the volume
7) #280028: O: reppu -- A network render program for blender
8) #304826: O: volume.app -- A dockapp enabling easy control of the volume
(1-8/3071) Is the bug you found listed above [y|N|m|r|q|s|f|?]? s
Please briefly describe your problem (you can elaborate in a moment; an empty
response will stop reportbug). This should be a concise summary of what is
wrong with the package, for example, "fails to send email" or "does not start
with -q option specified."
> oops
Enter any additional addresses this report should be sent to; press ENTER after
each address. Press ENTER on a blank line to continue.
>
How would you rate the severity of this problem or report?
1 critical makes unrelated software on the system (or the whole system)
break, or causes serious data loss, or introduces a security
hole on systems where you install the package.
2 grave makes the package in question unusable by most or all users,
or causes data loss, or introduces a security hole allowing
access to the accounts of users who use the package.
3 serious is a severe violation of Debian policy (that is, the problem
is a violation of a 'must' or 'required' directive); may or
may not affect the usability of the package. Note that non-
severe policy violations may be 'normal,' 'minor,' or
'wishlist' bugs. (Package maintainers may also designate
other bugs as 'serious' and thus release-critical; however,
end users should not do so.)
4 important a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package,
without rendering it completely unusable to everyone.
5 does-not-build a bug that stops the package from being built from source.
(This is a 'virtual severity'.)
6 normal a bug that does not undermine the usability of the whole
package; for example, a problem with a particular option or
menu item.
7 minor things like spelling mistakes and other minor cosmetic errors
that do not affect the core functionality of the package.
8 wishlist suggestions and requests for new features.
Please select a severity level: [normal]
reportbug: exiting due to user interrupt.
- -- Package-specific info:
** Environment settings:
EDITOR="gvim"
DEBEMAIL="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
INTERFACE="text"
** /home/sam/.reportbugrc:
reportbug_version "2.34"
mode advanced
ui text
realname "Sam Morris"
email "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
paranoid
sign gpg
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (530, 'testing'), (520, 'unstable'), (510, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.23-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii apt 0.7.9 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii python 2.4.4-6 An interactive high-level object-o
ii python-central 0.5.15 register and build utility for Pyt
reportbug recommends no packages.
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHYusishl/216gEHgRAt7OAJ9O8YPAJyJwaQwalOrYy6DEo8UR5ACgjpLR
5ukzHshF8HAn52wwdS5gc3s=
=Jcwm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
