Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2007, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> b) does not represent current practice >> c) not implementing the proposal is not a technical hindrance to any >> package > This is the same point. Just for the record, there's a small set of > packages not based on a Makefile for debian/rules. To be precise, there's one package that doesn't use a makefile and a set of around 14 that use a shell script wrapper around make. (I'm fairly sure that what the latter set are doing could be done with an included makefile, but I haven't checked to be sure.) -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
