Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Somehow I was thinking I had implemented a cache but I must have mixed up > with something else. Thanks for the check!
No problem. > I did my best to make it understandable compared to the old code. :) Well done. > Applied. But it doesn't give a huge performance boost. On a run on > kdemultimedia, it saves 8 seconds out of 3m12. I think we could save much Thanks! As for the performance gain, it really depends on how many packages you have installed, and I suspect also on how much RAM you have. At any rate, it shouldn't hurt as long as it doesn't introduce any new bugs, which I'm pretty sure I've avoided doing this time around. ;-) > But optimizing this part probably needs somewhat more care and is a bit > less straightforward. I also wonder how much memory it would cost on big > packages. Right, I was pondering that as well, but decided to stick with tthe straightforward optimization for now. > But if you have some time to spend on it, I'll happily review a patch. Good to know, but I don't anticipate having enough time anytime soon. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
