On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 09:07:19AM -0700, Benjamin Redelings I wrote: > Domenico Andreoli wrote: > >hi, i don't think this will happen any time before sarge release, when > >gcc-4.0 becomes the default compiler. at that time boost will have > >version 1.33.x or more. > gcc-4.0 will actually become the default compiler after the sarge > release, skipping gcc-3.4? If so, that's cool :)
yes. please read http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/04/msg00146.html > I was assuming something more along the lines of providing versioned > *.so files. I'm not sure if putting the BOOST version in the so-name is > standard, but perhaps you could boot the libstdc++ version in there also. and double the resources required for build? this would kill slow auto-builders. > >probably we can work around this. i'm thinking at uploading such version > >of boost, built with gcc-4.0, to experimental. > That would be cool :) > > I'm quite comfortable using things from experimental. actually boost 1.32.0 is not tested with gcc 4.0. probably i'll upload it built using gcc 3.4. cheers domenico -----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok --[ http://people.debian.org/~cavok/gpgkey.asc ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
