Package: n
Severity: wishlist
File: minc
Hello,
there were several new versions published by upstream since the
version that is presently distributed by Debian was released. It
might be the case that you intent to stick to version 1.5 because
it seems that version 2.0 was developed in parallel and I guess
there is an ABI change which might break some of your applications.
But even in this case it seems preferable to package version 1.5.1.
Moreover if you have reasons to stick to the 1.5 series of minc
we have to find a way to package 2.0.x in parallel because we
need this as precondition for BioImageSuite.
BTW, what do you think about group maintainance of the Debian-Med
packaging team and checking in your packaging stuff in the
Debian-Med SVN?
Kind regards
Andreas.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (5, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
