On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 16:50 -0400, Chris Capoccia wrote: > i'm not sure whether this is a leak or a normal report, but the first > subdirectory i picked finished and reported some data.
That's a leak, and one which I have been trying to fix. Did you manage to install the newer version of fontconfig that I sent along? I neglected to update the .so version number in the proposed package that I sent you, so I can't tell what's up in this case. If you have managed to install the newer package and it's still causing problems, I believe we've discovered another leak in libc. I found one such leak and managed to work around it by using private transcoding routines for UTF16-BE->UTF-8. If there are more such leaks, we'll probably have to push this up to the libc maintainers and get them fixed. Oh, did I mess up and send you only the fontconfig package and leave out the libfontconfig1_2.3.2-1_i386.deb package? That would certainly explain a lot here. If so, I can send that along to you without filling up the bug report with it and we can check the right package... -keith
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
