On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 06:39:46AM +0100, Laurent Licour wrote: > I think i have found the problem > > this is a (little) stack overflow in option.c. > I think that this handle by recent versions of gcc with stack-protector > option > > Here is the patch : > > --- perdition/options.c.ori 2007-11-02 05:42:00.000000000 +0100 > +++ perdition/options.c 2007-11-02 05:42:16.000000000 +0100 > @@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ > char lower_case[40]; > char strip_domain[40]; > #ifdef WITH_SSL_SUPPORT > - char ssl_mode[26]; > + char ssl_mode[40]; > char *ssl_mode_p = NULL; > #endif /* WITH_SSL_SUPPORT */ > > This is not optimal, but other parts of the code also use static buffers
Thanks. That seems sensible to me. -- Horms H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
