On 11/10/07 at 11:41 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: ruby1.9
> Version: 1.9.0+20070910-1
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm filing this bug against ruby1.9, since it's unlikely that we want to
> change that for ruby1.8.
>
> A common complain heard against Debian's ruby packaging is that
> libraries from stdlib and third party libraries are mixed in
> /usr/lib/ruby/1.{8,9/
>
> It would be better to have 3 different paths for libs:
> - one for libs from stdlib
> - one for packaged libs from third party
> -> Fedora uses /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/active_record, for example
> - one for manually installed libs
> -> /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/... ?
>
> What do you think ?
Note that OpenSUSE uses the patch described in this thread:
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/vframe.rb/ruby/ruby-core/10387?10325-10606
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
