On 10/17/07, Eugene Berdnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 01:05:11AM -0700, bishop wrote: > > That patch looks pretty mangled and the (apparent) Artifact ID it > > references doesn't look valid. > ... > > I've recognized to be the bug so reported. I'll put it on my queue, but > > I can't say when I'd be able to generate a set of patches from 301. > > Where is 3.01? Page http://vtun.sourceforge.net/download.html have only > references for 3.0.0, that's why I did not submit this patch again.
That's outdated, use http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2947 -- Martín Ferrari
