On 16/10/07 at 07:02 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I'm not sure I understand how: people with custom kernels could just set > > LH_LINUX_PACKAGES to "", no? > > it would be 'none', not "", otherwise it gets set to the default. > > however; checking for unionfs or aufs cannot be made reliable; you can't > know how the user is implementing it, by oot modules or by custom kernel.
I'm not questioning that. I'm just saying that if one of LH_LINUX_PACKAGES cannot be installed, it shouldn't continue to generate the image. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
