Hi Bernd! Am Montag, den 15.10.2007, 13:23 +0200 schrieb Bernd Zeimetz: > I can also rename genbox to radgenbox. > I guess your package attracts more people, so it should probably keep > the binaries name. On the other side - if genbox is only rarely used in > gromacs, the better thing would be to rename it there probably.
As a GROMACS user, I'd prefer to keep the name "genbox" since it's one of the tools in the GROMACS suite that is used quite often and a lot of my scripts would need an update to work on a name change. I think there are more people in the same situation. On the other hand, one of GROMCAS's tools has been renamed already. (ffscan, renamed to g_ffscan.) Since this one is rarely used (at least by me), I didn't find that bothering. I don't mind if genbox will be renamed. I just wanted to express my concerns. Best regards Manuel
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
