Do yourself the favour and `dpkg -L zope2.7` please. Why are we tree-linking into /usr/share already? #305854 is just one bug, there may be many more. And we are so close to a release.
Even though the patch in the bug seems to fix the issue, I am afraid
it won't be the last. Nor am I sure that the patch itself does not
break something.
It may well be too late, but I think we *have* *to* revert to
a known-to-be-good zope2.7 package, one which does not do any
symlink magic.
Please do so ASAP! If I do not hear from you by Sunday around noon,
I will proceed to restore the /usr/lib/zope2.7 structure.
Anyway, why should zope2.7 go to /usr/share anyway? There is nothing
to share about zope2.7. It makes sense to have Products in
/usr/share so they can be shared by versions and instances. But it
does not make sense to have Zope versions in /usr/share.
Please respond ASAP. The current state of affairs is terrible.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
"we are ready for any unforeseen event that may or may not occur."
- george w. bush
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
