On Wednesday 19 September 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 04:23:41PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > However, I doubt that pam should do this. Seems more like something for > > base-files, especially as I don't think we want to make it a conffile. > > Er, no. /etc/environment is a config file for pam_env and is owned by > PAM; there's no reason at all for base-files to be involved.
Hmm. Wasn't aware that /etc/environment was so pam-specific. Thought it was more general than that. But I'll trust you at your word as you undoubtedly know much better than I do :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
