On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 02:41:52PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: > Package: apt-cacher > Followup-For: Bug #374422 > > I now see this: > NOTE: For installations using a web server (CGI) the prefix should be > proxy.example.com/apt-cacher/? > > Is that intended? I notice the source (as shown in the patch earlier > in this bug report) is '?/' but that is rendered as '/?'.
Thanks for spotting this. > In either case, the meaning of the '?' is unclear to me. It would be > helpful to explain it, or perhaps to delete it (if it just stands for > "the rest of the URL"). Yes it does mean the rest of the URL. I have deleted it. > While I'm at it, here's the full current text: > > NOTE: For installations using a web server (CGI) the prefix > should be ???proxy.example.com/apt-cacher/???? instead, see > below. For installations with apt-cacher in daemon mode, the > modifications of sources.list can be replaced with a HTTP proxy > setting, see PROXY MODE USAGE below. > > And here are some grammatical fixes: > NOTE: For installations using a web server (CGI), the prefix > should be ???proxy.example.com/apt-cacher/???? instead; see > below. For installations with apt-cacher in daemon mode, the > modifications of sources.list can be replaced with a HTTP proxy > setting; see PROXY MODE USAGE below. Thanks, Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
