* Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-31 18:11]: > On Fri 2007-08-31 02:26:55 -0400, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > > In the SIL website [1], it is claimed that OFL is DFSG-compliant. > > Do you know of any public discussion (in debian-legal, for instance) > > about this? > > Good question. There was a discussion of the draft of OFL 1.1 here: > > http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/thread/20061221.004357.b55623ff.en.html > > and after the 1.1 release, more disussion: > > http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/thread/20070228.063718.83da0199.en.html > > The only caveat i've heard from folks is that Reserved Font Names > other than prior names of the font seem non-DFSG-free. since i've got > no Reserved Font Names other than the original name, i don't think > that's an issue.
Thanks for the links and sorry for the belated reply. I got distracted by other tasks since the beginning of September. I will upload your package soon. -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
