On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:52:45 +0200, Christopher Oezbek wrote: > I am reading through this and realize that probably you will run into > problems with 2 packages:
Thanks for your feedback on this issue! > JempBox and PDFBox which we use custom versions of (to make the download > size smaller). > PDFBox can be used out of the box, but with JempBox we use a really > homebrew version. I would have to check whether we can move to an official > version. Uh-oh. Yes, please do so. Otherwise all this effort to close the bug by packaging the dependencies would be in vain. Another possibility might be that you include the needed parts of JempBox in the JabRef source -- but in source form and compile when building JabRef. But just using the JempBox Debian Package would be better of course. > We also will get another couple of dependencies beyond 2.3 on Java Plugin > Framework, which will become even a larger mess. Which dependencies? > I will make a big red mark in my todo list, that we clean up those > dependencies, so that debian can include JabRef more easily. Thanks alot! > Btw. Gregor, are you a subscriber on the jabref-devel@ list? If not, you > should ask Morten about becoming a developer, so that you can... No, I'm not but I'll keep it in mind. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: Rolling Stones
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
