On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Jens Seidel wrote: > Could it be related to the fact that the release date of version -4 > in the changelog was by accident too old (even older as some bugs it > closes)?
No, that doesn't matter at all. If you're looking at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=hex-a-hop;dist=unstable, what you are seeing is the fixed/found/absent status of bugs in the source package in unstable. This means that since you just uploaded -5, it only recently was added to the archive. So for a brief period of time[1] bugs that had been fixed in -5 would be "done" but not fixed. http://wiki.debian.org/BugsVersionTracking explains to some extent what is going on. > No, I looked only at the source status. So I probably misinterpreted > the "built on all architectures" statement. If you're looking at src= page, it only cares about the version of the source package. Don Armstrong 1: Until the next archive pulse... -- There are two types of people in this world, good and bad. The good sleep better, but the bad seem to enjoy the waking hours much more. -- Woody Allen http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
