On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 04:48:41PM +0000, David Ammouial wrote: > El Wednesday 12 September 2007 17:29:11 Pierre Habouzit va escriure: > > It is named that way because it worked that way before. Though, with > > the growing number of packages, the user is often flooeded with many > > many changelogs entries he does not care about, so the default setting > > is more sensible, as NEWS.Debian are must-reads, whereas the changelogs > > are informational. > > OK, makes sense. > > > As there is debconf to help changing the setup and that the debconf > > question is properly worded, the few people wanting to read full > > changelogs can change that at apt-listchanges install time. > > Agreed. However, given that debconf default priority is medium, on most > installations the debconf question won't be worded at all, and > apt-listchanges will silently ignore the changelogs.
Yes but again, the kind of people caring about this config, is also the kind of people that reads manuals (hence will ask themselves how to tweak their apt-listchanges) or have their default debconf value set to low. So no, I like it this way. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgp5ZctaHnApJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
