On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 10:32:16 +0200 Erik Schanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Neil, > > Why did you change severity from grave to normal? Because this is not the fault of gnucash, the RC issue is in g-wrap. gnucash is just the victim. > Gnucash is currently unusable and this is that "grave" > says, or did I miss something? GnuCash is usable if you can revert to the version of g-wrap in testing. I'm running it now with: $ cat /etc/apt/preferences Package: g-wrap Pin: version 1.9.6-3.2 Pin-Priority: 1001 Package: guile-g-wrap Pin: version 1.9.6-3.2 Pin-Priority: 1001 i.e. there isn't anything wrong with gnucash and if g-wrap had transitioned properly, the g-wrap binary would not have been upgraded to 1.9.9 on your system until gnucash could use libgwrap-runtime2 instead of libgwrap-runtime0. With the correct dependencies set in g-wrap, this whole gnucash problem would have been avoided cleanly. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpckJjpoNqzx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
