package octave2.9-forge
tags 417494 wontfix
thanks

Am Montag, den 03.09.2007, 18:02 +0000 schrieb brian m. carlson:
> Since octave2.1 is marked wontfix (because it will no longer be relevant
> when gcc 4.3 is the default), is it acceptable to tag this bug that way
> as well?  I presume that octave2.1-forge depends on octave2.1, but I
> haven't checked.

Yes, you are correct. Sorry for the long delay, your message ended in my
spam folder.

        Thomas




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to