package octave2.9-forge tags 417494 wontfix thanks Am Montag, den 03.09.2007, 18:02 +0000 schrieb brian m. carlson: > Since octave2.1 is marked wontfix (because it will no longer be relevant > when gcc 4.3 is the default), is it acceptable to tag this bug that way > as well? I presume that octave2.1-forge depends on octave2.1, but I > haven't checked.
Yes, you are correct. Sorry for the long delay, your message ended in my spam folder. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]