On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 01:05:06AM -0700, Cameron Dale wrote: > On 8/26/07, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please read /usr/share/doc/exim4-config/NEWS.Debian.gz for 4.67-2 and > > 4.67-4: > > > > | update-exim4.conf looks for commented UPEX4CmacrosUPEX4C (which > > | used to be the place marker in earlier 4.67-x versions) and barfs > > | if it finds them anywhere in /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.template or > > | recursively /etc/exim4/conf.d. This check - as a feature - also > > | includes files that would normally be excluded by update-exim4.conf. > > WTF is UPEX4C?
update-exim4.conf > > You are therefore complaining about a documented feature. > > Additionally, please refer to the BTS if the "bug" you're going to > > report is already reported. This non-bug is. Multiple times. > > Call it a feature if you want, it seems wrong to me. I accept all > changes and still it barfs saying I should have accepted all changes. Sorry, the exim4 packages tend to err to the wrong side. > FWIW, I did scan the *84* open bugs for this and couldn't find it > reported. Why do you emphasize the *84*? Do you want to help in maintaining exim4? > Perhaps you should leave one open tagged as will-not-fix in the > future? Why? Is it asked too much to scan the fixed bugs as well? Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 3221 2323190 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
