* Gilles Sadowski: > Let me elaborate: > At some point of the simulation, the same quantity Q can be computed in 2 > different ways, say "QH" and "QL". When using "QL", the program is about > twice as fast as when using "QL". This is confirmed when using "-Xint". > Leaving out "-Xint" (for maximum performance), the result is, quite > surprisingly, the other way around: Using "QL" is about 50% slower than > with "QH"! > > Doesn't this indicate some subtle bug in the JIT compiler?
What about the absolute performance numbers? As long as long-running code doesn't run slower without -Xint, I don't think this is a JIT bug. It's somewhat expected that relative performance changes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
