Hi,

Let's take Helvetica for example.  Although Arial looks like
Helvetica, they are not the same fonts in design;  the differences in
interface are somewhat noticeable given that the users have been
familiar with original Helvetica font.  Compared with Arial, however,
Nimbus Sans L font, provided by gsfonts/gsfonts-x11 package, is the
real clone of Helvetica.  Using a different name is just a trademark
issue.  Therefore, I don't think it is a good idea to treat Arial as a
replacement of Helvetica interface given that Nimbus Sans L already
exists.

Well, Arial et al fonts are designed as replacements in design, but
this is just a company decision of Microsoft.  And in order to get rid
of trademark issues, these fonts do be designed with similar but
different interfaces.  Why should we follow such a not-so-wise
decision?

p.s., for the reference of defoma aliasing functionality, I'm not
familiar too.  I'm sorry for that.

On 8/22/07, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 August 2007 05:27, Hongzheng Wang wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Although Times New Roman, Arial, and Courier New are designed to be
> > replacements for famous Times, Helvetica, and Courier, they are not
> > the same fonts.  After all, the differences are obviouse if the users
> > are familiar with original Times, Helvetica, and Courier.  In
> > addition, gsfonts package has provided aliases, which are
> > design-compatible with original ones and are good enough in many
> > cases.  So, I think msttcorefonts package had better provide a user
> > decided option (prompt in configuration) for adding aliases.  And,
> > setting the priority to be as same as that in gsfonts might not be
> > good because it will confuse users.
>
> I'm not eager to add a configuration question - any such question further
> complicates and lengthens Debian's installation processes, so there should be
> good cause.
>
> In this case, since the fonts were designed to be drop in replacements of the
> original Times, Helvetica and Courier I do not see the problem with adding
> the Aliases. Could you let me know which concrete problem you're facing?
>
> I may consider lowering the priority - but I haven't found a reference for
> priorities yet. Do you have an indication of the scale of these priorities?
>
>
> Thijs
>
>


-- 
Hongzheng


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to