Hello Steve, On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 05:00:16PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 04:41:50PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > * Use linux-libc-dev now as build dependency (instead of > > linux-kernel-headers) > > This, though, is a bug, because linux-kernel-headers and linux-libc-dev are > both virtually build-essential (dependencies of libc6.1-dev). :) The > correct fix is to just drop this entry from the build-deps. I've just > committed this change now.
Ok, thanks for spotting.
> > I think you should upload our changes now. Since I am no kernel developer,
> > I cannot really judge some of your/upstream changes, so I leave it up
> > to you whether you upload to experimental or unstable (depends on the
> > pressure from 2.6.23 as well, of course).
>
> I would prefer to get someone to proactively test it with 2.6.23 before
> uploading to the archive, to save on round-trips if the current patch
> doesn't actually fix the PT_LOAD bug. But if nothing else, I'll upload it
> when 2.6.23 becomes available in unstable and I've had a chance to test it
> myself...
That's why I thought to upload to experimental - no automatic update
but (easier) possibility for testers. And aboot needs no autobuilders,
so port considerations are moot.
> > I have more changes (mostly in the documentatian/build area) in the
> > pipeline, I will see if I've time next weekend.
>
> > Thanks for your swift help on getting aboot in shape again!
>
> N/p, thanks for keeping an eye on its status. :)
Sure, after I've finally got (remote) access to an alpha again.
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
