On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > 2) Any idea why ${shlibs:Depends} does not include libsaslX?
> 
> Because the above check is wrong: the xfmail binary is *not* linked against
> libsasl.

Oh.

> $ objdump -p /tmp/xfmail/usr/bin/xfmail | grep NEEDED
>   NEEDED      libmail.so.0
>   NEEDED      libeditor.so.0
>   NEEDED      libface.so.0
>   NEEDED      libgdbm_compat.so.3
>   NEEDED      libgdbm.so.3
>   NEEDED      libnsl.so.1
>   NEEDED      libmcrypt.so.4
>   NEEDED      libltdl.so.3
>   NEEDED      libdl.so.2
>   NEEDED      libforms.so.1
>   NEEDED      libXpm.so.4
>   NEEDED      libSM.so.6
>   NEEDED      libICE.so.6
>   NEEDED      libX11.so.6
>   NEEDED      libesd.so.0
>   NEEDED      libaudiofile.so.0
>   NEEDED      libldap.so.2
>   NEEDED      liblber.so.2
>   NEEDED      libresolv.so.2
>   NEEDED      libglib-1.2.so.0
>   NEEDED      libstdc++.so.5
>   NEEDED      libm.so.6
>   NEEDED      libgcc_s.so.1
>   NEEDED      libc.so.6
> $
> 
> One or more of *these* libraries links against libsasl (apparently libldap),

Yeah, libldap does link against libsasl2.

> and this is the only reason sasl shows up in the output of ldd.  So there is
> no missing dependency.

That's a relief, it means xfmail in the NMU should be working fine...

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to